Legal Opinion

Airington v. Airington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1920No. 9757PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Grady County; Will Linn, Judge. Action by William Airington and others against Mrs. Willie Airington, all tenants in common, for partition and for rents and profits. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.

In a partition suit filed in the district court of Grady county, Oklahoma, by William Airington, Walter Airing-ton, and James Airington, as plaintiffs, against Mrs. Willie Airington, as defendant, the court entered a decree partitioning the property and also awarding judgment against the defendant for $447.20, as their proportion of the rental value of the premises. No complaint is made of that part of the decree partitioning the property, and the appeal is taken solely by -the defendant, Mrs. Airing-ton, from the money judgment against her. Parties will be denominated “plaintiffs” and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adams v. BristolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Ayotte v. NadeauMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Van Ormer v. HarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Lloyd v. TurnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  5. Cheney v. RicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. McWhorter v. McWhorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Markum v. MarkumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Neal v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Kelly v. DierksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API