Keith Hardware, Inc. v. White
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, Judge.
The issue on this interlocutory appeal granted pursuant to T.R.A.P. Rule 9, is whether the lease between the parties is too broad to be enforceable, as was held by the Trial Court.
Since 1994, appellant has been a tenant in appellees’ shopping center, and the lease contains the following clause:
*501During the term of this Lease, the Tenant shall have the exclusive and sole right to operate a retail store in the shopping center, the principal business of which is the selling of any one of the following classes of merchandise, to wit: hardware, housewares, automobile supplies,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- C.K. & J.K., Inc. v. Fairview Shopping Center Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc. v. Marc's Variety Store, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cummings v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc. v. Sheehy Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Alexander S. v. Arnold ConstableNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tippecanoe Associates II, LLC v. Kimco Lafayette 671, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Tippecanoe Associates II, LLC v. Kimco Lafayette 671, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005