Legal Opinion
Guido v. New York State Teachers' Retirement System
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 5, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Spain, J.
The facts in this case are not disputed. From 1962 until 1994 petitioner held a number of teaching positions as a member of respondent New York State Teachers’ Retirement System (hereinafter TRS). In January 1994 he ceased full-time teaching and, having vested his pension rights, was credited with 31 years of service. From 1958 to 1971, petitioner also engaged in seasonal employment with the New York Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation.
In 1994 petitioner inquired about the possibility of receiving retirement credit for his prior service with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re the Claim of GruberNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Whitehill v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Matter of Whitehill v. New York State Teachers'ret. Sys.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Miller v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hession v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Guido v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1999