Jenkins v. State of Mo.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUSSELL G. CLARK, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The function of a remedial plan in a school desegregation setting is to make the constitutional ideal of equal justice under the law a “living truth.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 20, 78 S.Ct. 1401, 1410, 3 L.Ed.2d 5 (1958). The basic remedial principle, repeatedly articulated by the courts in school desegregation cases, is that “the scope of the remedy is determined by the nature and extent of the constitutional violation.” Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 744, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 3127, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1974) (Milliken I); Columbus…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- William Earl Evans v. The Kansas City, Missouri School District American Federation of Teachers, Local 691Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Jenkins v. MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Jenkins v. State Of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.