Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sara Lowry v. City of San Diego

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2017No. 13-56141Published

1DissentThomas, Chief Judge

Sara Lowry was sleeping in the privacy of her office, when she was attacked and injured by a police dog trained to inflict harm on the first person it encounters. Because a reasonable jury could find that the City of San Diego’s use of a police dog was unreasonable under the circumstances presented here, I must respectfully dissent.

I

In my view, the district court erred in concluding that no reasonable jury could find that an excessive force constitutional violation had occurred. Under the Graham v. Connor framework, “[d]etermining whether the force used to effect a particular seizure is…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Bias v. MoynihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Chew v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API