Legal Opinion

Wells v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 1996No. 95-1639PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHAHOOD, Judge.

Appellant raises three issues on appeal. We affirm the trial court on the first two issues without comment. Appellant alleges as his third issue error by the trial court in sentencing him to a term in excess of that permitted by the sentencing guidelines. The state concedes error. We agree, and remand for resentencing.

Appellant’s sentencing guidelines score-sheet (case number 92-1443) reflected a recommended sentence of “ANSPS” (any nonstate prison sanction), and a permitted sentence of “up to 22 months incarceration.” Appellant had on two separate occasions violated probation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Mullins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marrs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API