Legal Opinion
Edmonds v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 24, 1987No. Civ. A. 75-1624-8, 78-0053-8, 78-0004-8 and 75-1857-8PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
BLATT, Chief Judge.
The instant cases are four (4) class actions, initiated separately in 1975, that sought payment from the United States of military pay in the form of Variable Reenlistment Bonuses (hereinafter VRB). These class actions have been successful, and have resulted in a total recovery that already exceeds Twenty-Seven Million and NO/100 ($27,000,000.00) Dollars, and that will probably exceed Thirty Million and NO/100 ($30,000,000.00) Dollars. The matter is now before this Court on plaintiffs’ Application for a Final Award of Attorneys’ Fees…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Omnivision Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In Re Activision Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
- Camden I Condominium Ass'n v. DunkleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Mashburn v. National Healthcare, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1988
- Camden I Condominium Association, Inc. v. John B. DunkleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.