James v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Prior to the submission of this case, the Attorney General filed a motion to strike the record on the ground that “there is no proper authentication of the record proper in this cause.”
Tit. 7, Sec. 767, Code 1940, provides, in part, that the transcript shall include the clerk’s “certificate that it is a complete transcript of all the proceedings in the cause.”
Supreme Court Rule 24 incorporates this requirement of Section 767, since it calls for inclusion in the transcript of “the certificate of the clerk to the correctness of the transcript.”
An appeal will be dismissed if the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. PeoplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
- Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
- Garrett v. McPhersonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kenneth Cantrell v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Cantrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Norton v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- James v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.