Titsworth v. Hyde
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. William A. Portee, Judge, presiding. This was an action ex contractu, brought in the court below, by Hyde and others, against Titsworth and others, as co-partners, under the name and style of A. D. Titsworth & Bros.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. William A. Portee, Judge, presiding. This was an action ex contractu, brought in the court below, by Hyde and others, against Titsworth and others, as co-partners, under the name and style of A. D. Titsworth & Bros. The plaintiffs sought to bring the cause to trial out of its regular order upon the docket, under the following rule of the superior court: “ Ordered, That in any case ex contractu, pending on an issue or issues of fact only, or only requiring the similiter to be added which is noticed for trial at any term, if the plaintiff, or…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAllister
This was an action of assumpsit, brought by appellees against appellant to the November term, 1869, of the superior court of Chicago, to recover upon two promissory notes made by appellant, payable to Ms own order and endorsed to appellees, amounting to about $1450, and upon the common counts.
It appears from the bill of exceptions that, upon an affidavit and notice, under the rule of that court, it' was ordered to be tried out of its order, and was so tried, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellees, upon which it was brought here by appeal. The points for reversal made by…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Goldsborough v. GableIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Farmers & Mechanics Life Ass'n v. CaineIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Hart v. StrongIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Jackson v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Flaningham v. HogueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.