Legal Opinion
Geissel Et Ux. v. Supplee
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 19, 1928No. Appeal 281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
The defendants were the owners of a tract of land containing about one hundred acres upon which had been erected a mansion house and a gardener’s house. The plaintiffs purchased the gardener’s house and one-half acre of ground surrounding it and at the time of the sale, it was indicated to the purchasers that the source of water supply of the gardener’s house came from a main which ran across the tract upon which the mansion house was situated. This is the only source of water supply for the plaintiffs’ house.
From 1924 to October 22,1927, the date of the filing of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Grace Methodist Episcopal Church v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Nauman v. Treen Box Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Anania v. SerentaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Koons v. McNameeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Motel 6, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Ira Vernon Pfile, A/K/A I. Vernon Pfile and Virginia v. Pfile, A/K/A M. Virginia PfileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Bowley v. Koze, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1962
- Gurecka, F. v. Carroll, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- McGurk v. Piecuch, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1937
- Senior & Schindel, Inc. v. Czinka, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1974