Legal Opinion

Winkelstein v. Solitare

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 27, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

There was a judgment for defendant in this action in tort for negligence; and plaintiffs appeal.

The agreed state of the case discloses this factual situation : On October 18th, 1940, at about 1:30 A. M., defendant drove his automobile to the home of a friend resident in Atlantic City to join his wife, a guest therein, and convey her home. He offered the same service to several other guests, and they accepted. He took the operator’s seat. His wife sat beside him; and his sister-in-law, Ann Solitare, “not a member of the defendant’s family or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Althorf v. . WolfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Geiss v. Twin City Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Kimball v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Hollidge v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Hill v. MoreySupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carter v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. LaytonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Petronzio v. BraydaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Walker v. ChoudharyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  5. Krueger v. Elder Mfg. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API