Legal Opinion

M. Rumley Co. v. Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1898No. 18,272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was brought by appellant against appellees to foreclose a chattel mortgage. The court made a special finding of the facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon, to each of which appellant excepted, and over appellant’s motion for a new trial, judgment was rendered in favor of appellees. • The errors assigned and not waived, call in question the conclusions of law. The special finding, so far as necessary to the determination of the question presented, may be summarized as follows: On *25August 2, 1892, appellant sold to appellee Samuel W. Pitts, an engine and .separator, who gave…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rapp v. KesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Combs v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Stevens v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spannuth v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API