Legal Opinion

SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. Lewis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2014No. 2014-0485PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Butler App. Nos. CA2012-11-239 and CA2013-05-068, 2014-Ohio-71. On review of order certifying a conflict, the court determines that a conflict exists on both issues certified. The parties are to brief issue 1 stated on pages 2-3 of the court of appeals’ entry filed March 12, 2014:

“In order to establish standing in a foreclosure action and invoke the jurisdiction of the common pleas court, must the plaintiff establish at the time complaint for foreclosure is filed that it has an interest in both the note and the mortgage, or is it sufficient if the Plaintiff demonstrates an interest in either…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. McFerrenOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. CitiMortgage, Inc. v. RoznowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Bank of New York Mellon v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Bank of America v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. GeorgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API