Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 1927PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe G-raee, J.

This cause comes to this court on an appeal from an adverse ruling on plaintiff's demurrer to certain paragraphs, presently noted, contained in the answer of the defendant. The controlling proposition involves the right of the defendant railroad company to asser* its easement to' maintain a certain steel-girder bridge about 80 feet in length at its present elevation, and the openings in its grades as they were on May 21, 1904, where its lines were then and are now extending across the Missouri River bottom from a point east of Pacific Junction, Iowa, westerly to the Missouri River, without…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Stodghill v. C., B. & Q. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Cook v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. Brown v. HoneyfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Janssen v. North Iowa Conference Pensions, Inc. of the Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Gray v. OsbornSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  3. Raub v. General Income Sponsors of Iowa, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Hayne v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Rance v. GaddisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API