Legal Opinion

Hampden Implement Co. v. Dougherty

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BueKB, Ch. J".

This is an action on an account to recover $875 the sale price of an automobile. The facts as shown by the evidence, are that Sam Loehr, son of John F. Loehr, on the 26th day of August, 1921, when he was fifteen years of age, had a conversation with his father, John Loehr, about a Ford sedan which his father “spoke about getting from the Iiampden Implement Company, the plaintiff.” He told his father that he was going into Hampden, and asked him, if he should bring the car out, that his father gave him some grain checks amounting to $298.09 and told him, “to pay those grain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Braithwaite v. AikenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Fox v. FoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hutchinson v. ClearyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Guillaume v. FlannerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kunze v. StangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hruby v. RomanickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Kunze v. StangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API