Legal Opinion · Dissent

400 Condominium Ass'n v. Gedo

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 1989No. 1—87—3390Published

1DissentJustice McMORROW

Applying the undisputed principles governing the law on property use restrictions, I cannot agree that section 21 constitutes a restriction on the use of units on floors 8 through 39. Illinois jurisprudence is clear that uses are permitted unless clearly prohibited. A restriction must be clearly stated, and any doubts must be resolved in favor of permitting the free use of property and against any limitation thereon. Section 21 contains no prohibition, limitation or mandate concerning the uses of units on floors 8 through 39, or for that matter, of floors 1 through 7 and 40. It merely permits…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. Triumvera Homeowners Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Freehling v. Development Management Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Cordogan v. UNION NAT'L BK. OF ELGINAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Wier v. IsenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. La Salle National Bank v. Village of PalatineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API