Legal Opinion

Young v. Baker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1915No. Nos. 19,017—(234)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to certain real estate. The case was tried before Hale, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial and an order denying his motion for amended and substituted findings of fact and conclusions of law, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Plaintiff asks that a deed absolute in form, given by his grantor Robert Schulz to defendant, be adjudged a mortgage. Schulz owned an undivided one-ninth interest in a tract of land which formed part of his father’s estate. February 14, 1902, he borrowed either $500 or $550 from the defendant, who is his aunt. No note was given and *399no security given at the time. On January 10, 1903, Schulz gave to defendant a deed absolute in form of all his interest in this land. Defendant claims that the deed of the land was given in payment of the loan, and she now claims title under this deed. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wakefield v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. State v. McCarteySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  3. Oertel v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Wall v. MeilkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. In Re Estate of MollanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Hartigan v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. In re the Assessment of Benefits, Costs & ExpensesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Stipe v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API