Standridge v. Union Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentBye, Circuit Judge
The Court holds Union Pacific’s exclusion of prescription contraception coverage does not violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2000e-17 (Title VII), as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978(PDA). Because I agree with how the district court framed the discrimination inquiry, and therefore agree with its conclusion that Union Pacific’s policy discriminates against women under Title VII, as amended by the PDA, I respectfully dissent.
The Court ends with the following pronouncement in footnote five: “Union Pacific provides an equal policy for its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Suzanne D. Kocak v. Community Health Partners of Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.