Legal Opinion

In re Morrison

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1920No. File No. 4359PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Original proceeding. . In the Matter of the Disbarment of P. C. Morrison, an attorney.

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

The Attorney General has applied for an order directing the payment of fees of witnesses, fees for serving subpoenas and expenses of taking depositions on behalf of the prosecution out of the Supreme Court disbarment fund. He claims that such fees and expenses should be paid out of such fund because of the decision on rehearing of the proceeding entitled In re Egan, 38 S. D. 224, 160 N. W. 814.

[1] In that opinion we were not considering whether expenses incurred should be paid' out of the Supreme Court fund on the one hand, or by the county to which- the matter was referred on the other hand.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Board of Commissioners of Edmund's CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In re EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In re EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re BartlettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API