Legal Opinion

Pittman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 21, 2003No. 5D03-2912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

859 So.2d 555 (2003)

Andre' PITTMAN, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2912.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 21, 2003.

Andre' Pittman, Jasper, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary G. Jolley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PETERSON, J.

Andre Pittman appeals the trial court's denial of his motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Pittman alleges that the written sentence in his case conflicts with the trial court's oral pronouncement and is therefore illegal. More…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Gonzales v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Berthiaume v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API