Legal Opinion

Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1953No. 3715PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

This appeal requires us to determine whether the telephone rates now in effect as the result of respondent commission’s order afford appellant a just and reasonable return. We hold that they do not, that the rates presently enforced are unreasonable, inadequate and confiscatory, and that the collection of the increased rates sought by the utility’s new schedules may no longer be suspended.

This proceeding was initiated by the filing by Bell Telephone Company of Nevada on April 14, 1950 of new schedules of intrastate rates and charges calculated to increase its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  2. In Re the Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. United States v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
  5. Application of Diamond State Tel. Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API