Quillen v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLewis, J.
1 I concur in affirming the conviction in Count II, but dissent from the Court's reso-Tution of Count I. The killing of one human being by another is homicide, either criminal, excusable, or justifiable. 21 0.98.2001, §§ 691, 692. From the facts related in 3 of the opinion, Appellant's failure to obtain medical care for her child was neither excusable nor justifiable When this omission tragically resulted in death, it was either murder or manslaughter.1 The jury convicted Appellant of the lesser included offense of second-degree felony murder, which required a finding that she caused her…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Massie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Malaske v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Sullinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.