Legal Opinion

De Guerin v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1932No. 4162PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevy, J.

(after stating the.case as above).

The appellant M. O. De Guerin predicates error in refusing to enter judgment in his favor because (1) the agreement as respects the sale and conveyance of the land to Johnnie Jackson expressly provided that M. 0. De Guerin should hold and retain the mineral rights to the land during the period of three years, and (2) the evidence established that M. C. De Guerin timely tendered and Johnnie Jackson refused a conveyance of the land with the reservation for three years of the minerals in the land, and (3) the suit was prematurely brought and cannot be maintained…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bounds v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Collum v. Sanger Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Blankenship v. DouglasTexas Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Ramirez v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. De Las Fuentes v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Madison v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Strong v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Shaver v. National Title & Abstract Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Jackson v. DeGuerinTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Strong v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API