Scurlock Oil Co. v. Getty Oil Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, Judge.
Plaintiff-in-reconvention, Robert L. Waterbury, has appealed from a trial court judgment which: dismissed his reconven-tional demand against defendant-in-recon-vention, Scurlock Oil Company; sustained Scurlock’s peremptory exception of res judi-cata; and granted Scurlock a summary judgment.
The litigation commenced as a concursus proceeding by Scurlock, which purchased the production from a unit well in St. Landry Parish. The question of who was entitled to the proceeds of the well has previously been litigated in Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil Company, 278 So.2d 851 (La.App.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cox v. WM Heroman & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- California Company v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Sliman v. McBeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Hunter Co. v. McHughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grace-Cajun Oil Co. No. 3 v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Lewis v. East Feliciana Parish School BoardDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1986
- Fitch v. Vintage Petroleum, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992