Legal Opinion

Tichenor v. Bruckheimer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, dismissing the complaint, and. from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The plaintiff was employed by the defendant receiver’s corporation, before its insolvency, on the 29th day of March, 1901, for a term of five years, beginning April 1, 1901, at a yearly salary of $1,700, to be paid in equal weekly instalments.

The action is brought for an unpaid balance under this contract for a period of twenty-three weeks, extending from April 1, 1901, to September 17, 1901, the total amount earned for that time being, as alleged, $751.87, of which $438.49 is admitted in the complaint to have been paid, and judgment is demanded for the balance of $313.38. After pleading the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tipton v. . FeitnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Oakley v. . MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Schnaier v. NathanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Penniman v. La GrangeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New Publication Co. v. SternAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API