Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1980No. Nos. 78-2016 to 78-2018PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

Friedman and Jobusch Architects and Engineers, Inc. and Bernard and Irma Friedman, individually, and Fred and Josephine Jobusch, individually, appeal from a decision by the United States Tax Court disqualifying from tax exempt status under I.R.C. § 501(a) a stock bonus trust created by the corporation. We affirm.

Petitioners Bernard Friedman and Fred Jobusch were principal shareholders and officers of petitioner corporation. In 1967 the corporation created a stock bonus plan intended to afford its employees a means of acquiring an ownership interest in the corporation.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cornell-Young Company v. United States of America, MacOn Prestressed Concrete Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Rufus Alonzo Thomason v. John H. KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Marbelite Corp. of America v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eleanor L. Fitzgerald v. Century Park, Inc., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Friedman And Jobusch, Architects And Engineers v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API