Ex Parte Oehler v. Clinton
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
This is a child custody case. Appellant, Brenda (Oehler) Clinton, mother, contends the trial court erroneously relied on S. C. Code § 20-7-796(a) (1983 Supp.) of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act in declining to exercise jurisdiction to entertain her custody action against respondents, Jay Mack and Jackie Oehler, the child’s paternal grandparents. We disagree and affirm.
In October 1976, appellant and Carl M. Oehler were divorced pursuant to an order of the North Carolina District Court. In a subsequent action, Carl Oehler was granted permanent custody of the couple’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hercules Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Comer v. ComerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Smart v. Charleston Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Derby v. KimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Dennis v. DennisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Bennett v. City of ClemsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Hogan v. PlattsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Bartley v. Bartley Logging Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.