Pezhman v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs motion to strike defendants’ answer was properly denied in light of her failure to submit an affirmation detailing the good faith efforts that were taken to resolve the discovery disputes (see Chichilnisky v Trustees of Columbia Univ. in City of N.Y., 45 AD3d 393 [2007]; 22 NYCRR 202.7). Furthermore, plaintiff did not demonstrate that defendants’ conduct during discovery was willful, contumacious or in bad faith (see Palmenta v Columbia Univ., 266 AD2d 90, 91 [1999]) Concur— Andrias, J.R, Nardelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Palmenta v. Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Chichilnisky v. Trustees of Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007