Legal Opinion

City of Charlotte v. Cook

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 21, 1997No. COA96-364PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

The question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in allowing the City of Charlotte (“the City”) to condemn a por*206tion of property belonging to defendant J. Ernest Cook and defendant Ruby H. Cook (“the Cooks”) in fee simple in order to construct a pipeline. Because the City’s actions constitute an abuse of discretion, we reverse.

The City instituted these condemnation actions under section 7.81 of its charter against the Cooks, the owners of the property, and Crescent Electric Membership Corporation, the holder of an option to purchase a portion of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. GroteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Brest v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. N. C. State Highway Commission v. Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Jennings v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Monroe v. W.F. Harris Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API