Pete v. State

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a conviction for robbery by assault; the punishment, ten years.

In the first and second grounds of error, appellant contends “that the admission into evidence of his confession was improper” and “there was no proper predicate established for admission into evidence of his confession.” The confession was not offered into evidence until cross-examination of appellant who had taken the stand to testify in his behalf. The following transpired:

“Q Now is that the statement that you signed ?

“A Yes, sir.

“Q Did the police officer read that up at the top…