Legal Opinion

In Re Faltin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1927No. Civil No. 2623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

- William Faltin, hereinafter called petitioner, made application for a writ of habea~s corpus, alleging that he was unlawfully imprisoned by the superintendent of the state prison. The writ was granted and, contrary to our usual practice, issued by and made returnable before this court sitting ii~ ba'nc, for the reason that it showed on its face it involved questions the correct and speedy determination of which is of importance to the state as a whole, as well as to the petitioner as an individual. The facts necessary for the determination of the matter are not disputed, and the issue is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. McNulty v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Heath v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Simborski v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Pueblo v. AreccoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  4. People v. AreccoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  5. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API