Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Alameda County
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 2, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00602Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 PAUL S. DANIELS, et al., Case No. 19-cv-00602-JSC 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 10 v. TO DISMISS AND STRIKE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 54 Defendants. 12 13 14 Paul Daniels and Nanette Dillard allege that they were prosecuted by the Alameda County 15 District Attorneys’ Office in retaliation for exercising their First Amendment rights. The Court 16 previously granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Section 1983 malicious and 17 retaliatory prosecution claim…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- William Leer Robert Larry Emerhiser v. Al Murphy Darrell Gardner Arvin AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Hartman v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.