Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. AT&T

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 6, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01950Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Antonio Goodwin, Case No. 2:23-cv-01950-GMN-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 AT&T, 9 Defendant. 10 11 This is an employment discrimination and retaliation case arising out of pro se Plaintiff 12 Antonio Goodwin’s allegations that his employer—Defendant AT&T—violated Title VII of the 13 Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiff sues Defendant for damages, claiming that Defendant 14 discriminated against him, harassed him, and treated him differently because of his race (African 15 American). Plaintiff also claims that, after he reported…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API