Legal Opinion

Hirning v. Sogn

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1926No. File Nos. 5752, 5753PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The two actions above entitled are consolidated by stipulation for appeal. The amended complaint in each case is by the superintendent of banks of the state of South. Dakota, pursuant to section 8937, R. C. .1919, seeking to enforce liability on the part of the defendants as stockholders in the failed First State Bank of Vienna. In each case the appealing defendant demurred to the amended complaint, on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ás against the 'demurrant. The demurrers' were overruled, and from the orders thereon, defendants Mabel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hirning v. ForsbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hirning v. KurleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Smith v. KennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API