Crosby v. Jarvis
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the landlord from final orders in favor of the tenant in summary proceedings, rendered by the Municipal Court of the city of ETew York, thirteenth district, borough of Manhattan.
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
In each of these proceedings to recover possession of real property for -the nonpayment of taxes, the justice made a final order in favor of the tenant, putting his decision upon the express ground that the Municipal Court “has no jurisdiction in the premises and that these summary proceedings under the statute will not lie -because a right of ‘ re-entry ’ for the same cause is reserved in the lease.” The premises are now held under a lease for twenty-one years, executed in 1892, being a second renewal of a lease executed in 1850. It is expressly agreed in the present lease that it is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Michaels v. . FishelNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Bixby v. Casino Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Fleishauer v. BellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Income Properties Investment Corp. v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Allen v. HounWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Walther v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908