Legal Opinion

Jose Tineo v. Attorney General United State

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 4, 2019No. 16-1461PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 16-1461 _____________ JOSE FRANCISCO TINEO AKA Luis Alberto Padilla, AKA Jose Sanchez, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent ______________ On Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Justice Board of Immigration Appeals (A040-015-082) Immigration Judge: Walter A. Durling ______________ Argued January 19, 2018 ______________ Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, GREENAWAY, JR., and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges. (Opinion Filed: September 4, 2019) ______________ OPINION…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joshua Watters v. Board of School DirectorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  2. Colin-Villavicencio v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. BAEZ MORFA v. BLINKENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  4. Charles Akabuogu v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  5. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API