Went v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiffs brought an action against the defendant in which they alleged that the defendant promised to pay them the reasonable value of services rendered in caring for her in their home. The defendant made default of appearance. The trial court, having heard the plaintiffs, gave judgment for the defendant and the plaintiffs have appealed. “A default in an action for legal relief admits the material facts declared on as constituting a cause of action, and that, if these do constitute a cause of action, the plaintiff has a right to recover at least nominal damages.” Starr Cash & Package…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cheshire Brass Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Paiwich v. KrieswalisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Shepard v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. HungerfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Fox v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Whitman Hotel Corporation v. Elliott & Watrous Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Riccio v. AbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Reilly v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Schmeltz v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.