Winkler v. State

As to the first and second counts it is claimed by the defendant below that the evidence of the one witness called by the State as to the occurrence on September 7th, contradicted as it is by defendant’s own testimony, is insufficient both as to the alleged facts of possession and sale and as to the article sold and possessed, if such were proven, being intoxicating liquor. The evidence as to the possession and sale was sufficient to support the jury’s finding and cannot be disturbed. The witness who testified as to the sale also testified that in his opinion that which he then purchased was…