Holmes v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Plaintiffs recovered judgment against the defendants in the sum of $3,200 for the value of a certain automobile.
Upon the judgment roll appeal of defendant Cyril Saunders, the judgment was reversed upon the ground that the record, including the complaint and the findings of fact, demonstrated that plaintiffs’ cause of action depended upon their success in a lottery, “which is a criminal offense,” and therefore “the doors of the courts are closed to them. (6 Cal. Jur., Contracts, §106, pp. 150-152.) ” (Holmes v. Saunders, 114 Cal.App.2d 389, 391 [250 P.2d 269].)
While the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schubert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Holmes v. SaundersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gonzales v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Textron Financial Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Munoz v. MacMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Rogers v. Bill & Vince's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Reid v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.