Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Sanders

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 12, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAGLAND, P. J. —

This is the second appeal in this case. The first is reported in 288 Missouri Reports at page 337 and following. The action is one to recover, with interest the several sums paid for five negotiable promissory notes which subsequently proved to be forgeries. The purchase of each note constituted a separate transaction. The petition is correspondingly in'five counts. As the basis for the recovery soug'ht each alleges: “That defendant sold and delivered to plaintiff and plaintiff purchased from defendant what purported to be and what defendant then warranted to be, and plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Pavement Co. v. Smith, Beggs & Ranken Machine Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Alvin Fruit & Truck Ass'n v. HartmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Austin v. Trotter's Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Jackson v. Farmers Union Livestock CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Mullins v. Sam Scism Motors, IncorporatedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Acorn Printing Company v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Davies v. Motor Radio Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API