Weedin v. Wong Jun
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The appeal presents the question of law whether upon the admitted facts Wong Chai Chong is a merchant. The rulings of immigration officials upon the question whether a restaurant keeper is a merchant have, at different periods, been subject to change. Until 1893 he was held to be a laborer. Thereafter, owing to the opinion of' the Attorney General (20 Op. Attys. Gen. 602), the reverse was held. In consequence of the decisions in Ah Yow (D. C.) 59 F. 561, and United States v. Chung Ki Foon (D. C.) 83 F. 143, it was again ruled that a restaurant keeper was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toxaway Hotel Co. v. Smathers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Lee CheeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- In re Ah YowDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1894
- United States v. Chung Ki FoonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1897
- Nollman & Co. v. Wentworth Lunch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Low YinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1926
- United States ex relWong Sai Chaam v. Commissioner of Immigration at Port of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Ex parte Naoe MinamijiDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1929
- Ex parte PoyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
- United States ex rel. Wong Sai Chaam v. Commissioner of ImmigrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.