Legal Opinion

Exparte Holmes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 15, 1840PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Habeas corpus, issued to the sheriff of Washington county, upon the petition of George Holmes, who was imprisoned in the common jail at Montpelier, in said county. John Starkweather, sheriff of said county of Washington, and keeper in chief of said jail, in obedience to said writ, brought the said Holmes into court, and, in his return, stated that he held the said Holmes in custody by virtue of a warrant issued by the governor of this state, of which the following is a copy.

Read the full summary

Habeas corpus, issued to the sheriff of Washington county, upon the petition of George Holmes, who was imprisoned in the common jail at Montpelier, in said county. John Starkweather, sheriff of said county of Washington, and keeper in chief of said jail, in obedience to said writ, brought the said Holmes into court, and, in his return, stated that he held the said Holmes in custody by virtue of a warrant issued by the governor of this state, of which the following is a copy. “ State of Vermont. To John Starkweather, Esq. sheriff “ of Washington county. “ Whereas, George Holmes, late of Sorel,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Williams, Ch. J.

— George Holmes is brought before the court on a habeas corpus. The return shows that he is imprisoned by virtue of a warrant issued by the governor of this state. An amendment has been made to the order of the governor, since the case was before the court in Washington county in July last, in a very important particular, as will appear from the return of the sheriff. A motion is now made for the discharge of Holmes. When this application was heard last July, I was detained from the court by sickness and took no part in their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Houston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. Bechtol v. Cobaugh ex rel. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1823

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. RauscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Morrell v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  3. City of Bridgeport v. AgostinelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Office of the Auditor of Accounts v. Office of the Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  5. The People Ex Rel. Barlow v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API