Legal Opinion

Musso v. University of Minnesota

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1997No. 95-4234MN, 96-1035MNPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAGG, Circuit Judge.

In 1980, the University of Minnesota entered into a consent decree (the Rajender decree) governing sex discrimination claims brought by female academic employees. Sandra Y. Musso filed suit under the decree, contending the University first demoted her and then refused to renew her contract as Director of Sports Facilities because of Mus-so’s sex. Later, the district court 'permitted Musso to add a claim of retaliatory firing that arose after the Rajender decree had expired. The University appeals the district court’s finding of unlawful retaliation, and Musso cross-appeals…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Aburime v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Mahers v. HedgepethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Iron Workers Local Union No. 17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  2. Sandra Y. Musso v. University of Minnesota Regents of the University of Minnesota, Sandra Y. Musso v. University of Minnesota Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API