Tate v. Stevens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to bifurcate the trial (see, *1040CPLR 603; 22 NYCRR 202.42). Plaintiff commenced this negligence action seeking damages for injuries that he sustained when defendant’s car hit plaintiffs car at an intersection. Each party contends that the other ran a red light. Plaintiff contends that evidence of his injuries is necessary to counter the contention of defendant that he entered the intersection from a complete stop and was traveling at a speed of 7 or 8 miles per hour.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parmar v. SkinnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Addesso v. Belting Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Loncz v. BlagroveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Delano v. GrazulewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Carr-Hoagland v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- DiCesare v. GlasgowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002