Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1898No. Nos. 10,917-(263)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff, as special administrator of the estate of Reuben A. Richmond, deceased, from an order of the district court for Stearns county,o Searle, J., denying his motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

Several questions are raised by the appellant, and the disposition *454of any one of them against him leads to an affirmance of the order of the trial court; hence the only question which we shall discuss is the one involving the right of the special administrator to maintain this action.

Briefly stated, the facts are these: Reuben A. Richmond, the brother of the plaintiff, died intestate, leaving certain personal property, such as is usually kept in a drug store, upon which he had given a chattel mortgage to the defendant, Campbell, for $2,200, for the purchase price of said property. Richmond…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donohue v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Larson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API