Legal Opinion

United States v. LBS Bank-New York, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1990No. Crim. A. 88-00516-05PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DuBOIS, District Judge.

After a twelve week trial, defendant LBS Bank — New York, Inc., (“LBS” or “the Bank”) was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States 1 under 18 U.S.C. § 371. 2 Presently before the Court are the Bank’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal (sometimes referred to as “Motion for JA”) and Motion for New Trial (sometimes referred to as “Motion for NT”). For the reasons stated in the opinion below, the Bank’s Motions will be denied.

1. Motion for Judgment of Acquittal

A. Due Process Claim

Defendant LBS argues that the Court must…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. United States v. Delaine F. BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Birbiglia v. Saint Vincent Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. In Re Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. PCB Contamination Insurance Coverage LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Dynegy, Inc. v. Yates, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API