C. J. Jones Lumber Co. v. Morrison
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partShannon, Chief Judge
I concur in the reasoning of the majority opinion as to the incorrectness of the jury verdict; however, I regret that I must dissent from the result reached by the majority. From the facts and evidence as set out in the majority opinion, and as elaborated upon hereafter, I feel that a verdict should have been directed for the defendants at the conclusion of all of the evidence. I therefore direct my attention to this sole issue.
Involved here is Sec. 317.47, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., which provides that the truck was required to have two headlights; and under Sec. 317.46, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., these…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. SharpMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
- Clark v. SumnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Borrson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Russell v. Mississippi Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
- Alessi v. FarkasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.