Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Beatty

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1932No. File No. 7300PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.

Defendants Beatty and Bland, copartners as Black Hills Tin Company, were operating a mining property near the town of Tinton. They required timber for use in their operations, and had set up a sawmill where they were preparing such material. The logging operations of defendants, whereby trees were cut and brought to the mill to be worked up for defendants’ use, were in charge of a foreman nanied Evans. Evans observed certain trees which were of the type suited to defendants’ use, and stated to defendant Bland that he thought those trees should be cut and logged and put through the mill before…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ward v. LaCreek Electric AssociationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Big Rock Mountain Corporation v. Stearns-Roger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API