Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Schabow

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1953PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

As appears from the foregoing, the case was tried upon the theory that the defendant was or was not guilty of negligence in his failure to place enough oil in the crankcase for the proper operation of the motor. The case should not have been tried upon that theory. When the plaintiff requested the defendant to fill her crankcase and the defendant undertook to do so they assumed the relationship of contractors. If the defendant failed to do so his failure was a breach of the contract, whether it resulted from his negligence or otherwise.

This court has upon some occasions, not too frequent,…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coe v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Sprecher v. Weston's Bar, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Nashban Barrel & Container Co. v. G. G. Parsons Trucking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Banner v. Town of DaytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Erving Paper Mills v. Hudson-Sharp MacHine Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API