Cason v. State

Randall John Cason appeals his conviction and sentence of imprisonment. We find that none of the four grounds for relief claimed by Cason constituted reversible error and, thus, affirm the conviction and sentence.

Cason first contends that Count I of the information was fatally deficient since it failed to inform him adequately of the conspiracy charges against him. Our review reveals that the language of the information properly tracked the conspiracy statute and sufficiently apprised Cason of the charge. State v. Mena, 471 So.2d 1297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); § 777.04, Fla.Stat. (1985).

Cason’s…